Kurt Biray
The draconian Anti-Terrorism Act (Bill C-51) is a hot topic and
election issue for the federal political parties as well as grassroots
organizations and activist groups. The notorious and highly criticized Bill
C-51 received Royal Assent and became law earlier this year, amending the
Criminal Code of Canada and outright violating the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms. For the Harper Conservatives and their support base, Bill C-51 is
an attempt to strengthen Canada's national security by targeting suspected
terrorist activities at home and abroad. For the vast majority of Canadians,
this law is a direct and blatant infraction of our democratic, civil and labour
rights.
The purpose of this legislation is to extend police powers for
the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), RCMP and law enforcement
agencies, primarily giving CSIS the ability to disrupt any potential “threats
to Canada's national security”. CSIS was created in 1984 by the Mulroney
Government as an intelligence gathering agency, after a series of scandals
created by the RCMP’s trampling of civil liberties. The Harper Government has
extended CSIS’ mandate, turning it into a secret police force.
With judicial authority, CSIS now has the power to shut down or
remove radical websites, Facebook and Twitter accounts (whatever they deem as
being radical) and to collect personal information and documents (ex. bank
account and travel information) from suspected terrorists. CSIS' extended
mandate and augmented powers have many Canadians wondering how their
fundamental freedoms will be compromised by the Harper Government.
Many Canadians are apprehensive with regards to the enactment
of Bill C-51 and their questions and concerns are perfectly legitimate. The
most troubling and dubious aspect of this legislation is its ambiguity. There
is very little information regarding the legal parameters and judicial limits
of the various provisions of Bill C-51. For example, one of the most
questionable and draconian stipulations "criminalizes the advocacy or
glorification of terrorism". This provision on its own can be interpreted
indefinitely. Does this pertain to jihadi terrorism only? Does it also pertain
to political dissidents and lawful protesters who are disgruntled with the
Harper Government's right-wing fiscal and foreign policy agendas? What about
activists who speak in favor of boycotting Israel, who the Harper government’s
friends have already labelled as supporters of terrorism.
Another stipulation of this legislation "outlaws any
threat to Canada's economic security". Is this applicable to public and
private sector unions that lawfully go on strike due to a loss in benefits,
poor working conditions and frozen wages? Harper’s back-to-work legislation
against workers at Air Canada and Canada Post used “economic security”
arguments to remove labour rights. These questions remain unanswered.
The Conservative Government claims that the purpose of Bill
C-51 is to target and disrupt terrorist-related activities. However, it seems
that this law intends to target and crush groups and organizations on the
political left. This includes the labour movement, Aboriginal movements,
environmentalists (esp. pipeline protesters) and socialists/communists. The
government intends to shut down any political dissent or lawful protests under
the pretense of targeting suspected terrorists and terror-related activities.
The Harper Conservatives made some minor and insignificant
amendments to Bill C-51 in Parliament earlier this year. “Lawful” protest and
dissent were excluded from the bill and CSIS' ability to "make
arrests" was downgraded to "disrupt potential threats to Canada's
national security". The amendments still remain ambiguous. For example,
how will CSIS, RCMP and law enforcement distinguish between what is “lawful”
and “unlawful”? Can lawful protest and dissent be interpreted as being
unlawful? This already happens extremely regularly, for example police in
Montreal have made it a habit of declaring protests illegal the moment they
assemble, using anti-democratic municipal legislation.
The federal parties and leaders hold differing views regarding
Bill C-51 as it is an integral component of their election platforms. The
Conservatives obviously support the law in its entirety. The Liberals want to
see more amendments to the legislation and the NDP and Greens want to outright
repeal it. The Communist Party of Canada was the first to speak out against the
Bill and wants to repeal it and dismantle CSIS. With this information, it is
clear that the political left and all defenders of democratic rights in this
country must mobilize and work towards preventing the Conservatives or Liberals
from forming a government after the October 19th federal election. If the
Liberals get elected, they must be forced to change their position and repeal
the legislation. The vast majority of Canadians want to see this law repealed
as it threatens their basic and fundamental freedoms, undoubtedly violating the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
No comments:
Post a Comment