November 17, 2009
On October 22nd, over 500 HandyDart workers represented by the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) local 1724 issued a 72 hour strike notice to MVT Canadian Bus Inc.
The deceptively named MVT Canadian Bus Inc. is a California based company which took over the operation of HandyDart services in late 2008. HandyDart provides specialized public transit services for passengers with physical or cognitive disabilities which make them unable to use the other existing transit services.
Job action was set to take effect on October 26th, but many ATU members were turned away when attempting to attend their duties on October 25th, the day before the end of the 72 hour notice. The corporate media predictably launched into an immediate anti-worker frenzy, attempting to paint the ATU as a gang of greedy thugs more than happy to strand the disabled and elderly for a quick buck.
Meanwhile, back in reality the situation is quite different than in the imaginary world of corporate media. In fact, the ATU went to great lengths to avoid a strike which they knew could inconvenience the passengers they carry each day. The ATU attempted for over eight months to bargain with MVT which met its workers with nothing but demands for unreasonable concessions which would destroy all the gains made by HandyDart workers over the last two decades.
These concessions include major cuts to benefits, reduction of shifts but as much as half and elimination of the workers pension plan. It also fails to address the question of HandyDart operator’s wages which are still below those of conventional bus drivers. All of this is nothing but a blatant drive to weaken the union and boost its own profits.
Under these conditions the members of ATU 1724 had no better option than to vote to strike. And so they did, an impressive 97% strike vote was achieved, giving a powerful mandate for job action against the corporate greed of MVT. At the same time, services are continuing to run at essential service levels for those who could otherwise face serious implications to their well being such as cancer therapy and kidney dialysis patients.
As events unfold it becomes increasingly clear that this is not a case of “greedy” workers demanding more at the expense of the elderly and disabled. Rather, it is a case of a greedy U.S. corporation seeking to extract higher rates of profit by putting the squeeze on hard working unionized drivers who provide an important public service not just for the pay cheque, but also because they care.
In this struggle can also be found evidence of the negative effects of privatization and contracting out. This attack by MVT transit is cause for renewed calls for public and democratic ownership and control of public transit, for a democratically elected and accountable Translink board, and for increased transit funding leading to expanded service and reduced (and then eliminated) fares. All of this runs counter to the corporate agenda of the current Liberal government provincially and Conservative government federally.
With collective bargaining in the near future for other transit workers and the majority of the public sector in general, there is added urgency to the need to unite with HandyDart workers and help to see that their struggle is successful. If not, we may soon see how accurate the old saying that “an injury to one is an injury to all,” really is.
November 16, 2009
16 November 2009
The Young Communist League of South Africa (uFasimba) welcomes the Alliance Summit outcomes and declaration as presented yesterday by the leaders of Cosatu, SACP, SANCO and ANC. The Summit is a representation of a departure from old-school mentality of such gatherings being a platform to further alienate the Alliance partners from the ANC, and shows the determination of our leaders to unite all of South Africa.
The outcomes of the Summit also disproved the prophets of doom whose intentions were to see the Alliance ultimately break in the hands of the current leadership. We are also pleased that those who are in the leadership and were quoted as saying there is an intended left takeover, have come to appreciate and endorse the new spirit of sustaining lifelong relations amongst the allies.
We particularly welcome the determination by our leadership to focus on employment creation as a crisis that affects millions of young people around the country. The youth of our country have been the most hit by the economic recession, which resulted in retrenchments that followed the “last in first out principle”. The hunger for new jobs represents a powder-keg that is waiting to explode, and the sooner this is addressed the better.
We further welcome the commitment by the Alliance leadership to vigorously campaign against HIV/AIDS, again a nemesis for the youth of our country. The statistics presented by the Department of Health on the shocking rate of deaths in relation to the rate of births, and the number of young people infected with HIV/AIDS means that our political leadership should depart from denying the existence of HIV/AIDs and enter a new paradigm of uniting our country against this scourge. The resolutions of the Summit presents hope to our youth that those who are infected will be provided with anti-retroviral drugs and that those who are not, will get adequate health care that will keep them healthy and fit.
We equally welcome the “uncomfortable” attitude of the Alliance leadership towards the 45% tariff increase over the next three years by Eskom. This means that the Alliance takes the impact of the tariffs on our economy and on the working class and the poor seriously. We hope that the leadership of Eskom or Nersa will heed to this call and ensure that they halt their intentions, and raise money elsewhere.
We want to state for the record that we are not surprised that the President of the Republic intervened on the Eskom crisis. Eskom remains a national company and any crisis that happens in that institution should require an intervention from the highest office of the land. The Democratic Alliance would have done the same and even worse, and that they should not use this as a platform to win votes in future elections.
The YCLSA will do everything in its powers to ensure that the Alliance remains united, focused and provide leadership to society. We call on all members of the Alliance structures to ensure that the same spirit as displayed over the weekend at the Summit filters down to provincial, regional and local structures.
Issued by the YCLSA Head office
November 15, 2009
by Eva Golinger,
Henry Kissinger said that diplomacy is the "art of restraining power." Obviously, the most influential ideologue on US foreign policy of the twenty-first century was referring to the necessity to "restrain the power" of other countries and governments in order to maintain the dominant world power of the United States. Presidents in the style of George W. Bush employed "Hard Power" to achieve this goal: weapons, bombs, threats, and military invasions. Others, like Bill Clinton, used "Soft Power": cultural warfare, Hollywood, ideals, diplomacy, moral authority, and campaigns to "win the hearts and minds" of those in enemy nations. The Obama administration has opted for a mutation of these two concepts, fusing military power with diplomacy, political and economic influence with cultural penetration and legal maneuvering. They call this "Smart Power." Its first application is the coup d'état in Honduras, and as of today, it's worked to perfection.
During her confirmation hearing before the Senate, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remarked that "We must use what has been called smart power, the full range of tools at our disposal -- diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal, and cultural -- picking the right tool or combination of tools for each situation. With smart power, diplomacy will be the vanguard of our foreign policy." Clinton later reinforced this concept affirming that the "wisest path will be to first use persuasion."
So, what is intelligent about this concept? It's a form of politics that is difficult to classify, difficult to detect, and difficult to deconstruct. Honduras is a clear example. On one hand, President Obama condemned the coup against President Zelaya while his ambassador in Tegucigalpa held regular meetings with the coup leaders. Secretary of State Clinton repeated over and over again during the past four months that Washington didn't want to "influence" the situation in Honduras -- that Hondurans needed to resolve their crisis, without outside interference. But it was Washington that imposed the mediation process "led" by President Oscar Arias of Costa Rica, and Washington that kept funding the coup regime and its supporters via USAID, and Washington that controlled and commanded the Honduran armed forces, involved in repressing the people and imposing a brutal regime, through its massive military presence in the Soto Cano military base.
Washington lobbyists also wrote the San José "agreement," and in the end, it was the high-level State Department and White House delegation that "persuaded" the Hondurans to accept the agreement. Despite the constant US interference in the coup d'état in Honduras -- funding, design, and political and military support -- Washington's "smart power" approach was able to distort public opinion and make the Obama administration come out as the grand victor of "multilateralism."
What "smart power" achieved was a way to disguise Washington's unilateralism as multilateralism. From day one, Washington imposed its agenda. On July 1st, spokespeople for the Department of State admitted in a press briefing that they had prior knowledge of the coup in Honduras. They also admitted that two high-level State Department officials, Thomas Shannon and James Steinberg, were in Honduras the week before the coup, meeting with the civil and military groups involved. They said their purpose was to "impede the coup," but how, then, can they explain that the airplane that forcefully exiled President Zelaya left from the Soto Cano military base in the presence of US military officers?
The facts demonstrate the truth about Washington and the coup in Honduras and the subsequent successful experiment with "smart power." Washington knew about the coup before it happened, yet continued to fund those involved via USAID and NED. The Pentagon aided in the illegal forced exile of President Zelaya, and later, the Obama administration used the Organization of American States (OAS) -- during a moment at which it was on the border of extinction -- as a façade to impose its agenda. The discourse of the Department of State always legitimated the coup leaders, calling on "both parts . . . to resolve the political dispute in a peaceful way through dialogue." Since when is an illegal usurper of power considered a "legitimate part" capable of dialogue? Obviously, a criminal actor who takes power by force is not interested in dialoguing. Based on this Washington logic, the world should call on the Obama administration to "resolve its political dispute with Al Qaeda in a peaceful way through dialogue, and not war."
The Obama/Clinton "smart power" achieved its first victory during the initial days of the coup, persuading the member states of the OAS to accept a 72-hour wait period to allow the coup regime in Honduras to "think through its actions." Soon after, Secretary of State Clinton imposed the mediation efforts, led by Arias, and by then, so much space had been ceded to Washington that the US just stepped in and took the reigns. When President Zelaya went to Washington and met with Clinton, it was obvious who was in control. And that's how they played it out, buying more and more time up until the last minute, so that even if Zelaya returns to power now he will have no space or time to govern.
The people were left out, excluded. Months of repression, violence, persecution, human rights violations, curfews, media closures, tortures, and political assassinations have been forgotten. What a relief, as Assistant Secretary of State Thomas Shannon remarked upon achieving the signature of Micheletti and Zelaya on the final "agreement," that the situation in Honduras was resolved "without violence."
Upon the signing of the "agreement" this past October 30th, Washington immediately lifted the few restrictions it had imposed on the coup regime as a pressure tactic. Now they can get visas again and travel north, they don't have to worry about the millions of dollars from USAID, which hadn't even been suspended in the first place. The US military in presence in Soto Cano can reinitiate all their activities -- oh wait, they never stopped in the first place. The Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) of the Pentagon affirmed just days after the coup that "everything is normal with our armed forces in Honduras, they are engaging in their usual activities with their Honduran counterparts." And Washington is already preparing its delegation of elections observers for the November 29th presidential elections -- they are already on their way.
Forget about Cold War torturer Billy Joya who was scheming with the coup regime against the resistance; or the Colombian paramilitary forces sent in to help the coup regime "control" the population. Don't worry anymore about the sonic warfare LRAD weapon used to torture those inside the Brazilian embassy in an attempt to oust Zelaya from the building. Nothing happened. As Thomas Shannon said, "we congratulate two great men for reaching this historic agreement." And Secretary of State Clinton commented that "this agreement is a tremendous achievement for the Hondurans." Wait, for whom?
In the end, the celebrated "agreement" imposed by Washington only calls upon the Honduran Congress -- the same Congress that falsified Zelaya's resignation letter in order to justify the coup, and the same Congress that supported the illegal installation of Micheletti in the presidency -- to determine whether or not it wants to reinstate Zelaya as president. And only after receiving a legal opinion from the Honduran Supreme Court -- the same one that said Zelaya was a traitor for calling for a non-binding poll vote on potential future constitutional reform, and the same one that ordered his violent capture. Even if the Congress' answer is positive, Zelaya would not have any power. The "agreement" stipulates that the members of his cabinet will be imposed by those political parties involved in the coup, the armed forces will be under the control of the Supreme Court that supported the coup, and Zelaya could be tried for his alleged "crime" of "treason" because he wanted to have a non-binding poll on constitutional reform.
Per the "agreement" a truth commission would supervise its implementation. Today, Ricardo Lagos, ex president of Chile and staunch Washington ally, was announced as the leader of the Honduran Truth Commission. Lagos is co-director of the Board of Directors of the Inter-American Dialogue, a right-wing think tank that influences Washington's policies on Latin America. Lagos also was charged with creating a Chilean version of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), la Fundación Democracia y Desarrollo, to "promote democracy" in Latin America, US-style. Upon leaving the presidency in 2006, Lagos was named President of the Club of Madrid -- an exclusive club of ex presidents dedicated to "promoting democracy" around the world. Several key figures involved in currently destabilizing left-leaning Latin American governments are members of this "club," including Jorge Quiroga and Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada (ex presidents of Bolivia), Felipe González (ex prime minister of Spain), Václav Havel (ex president of the Czech Republic), and José María Aznar (ex prime minister of Spain), amongst many others.
In the end, "smart power" was sufficiently intelligent to deceive those who today celebrate an "end to the crisis" in Honduras. But, for a majority of people in Latin America, the victory of Obama's "smart power" in Honduras is a dark and dangerous shadow closing in on us. Initiatives such as ALBA have just begun to achieve a level of Latin American independence from the dominant northern power. For the first time in history, the nations and peoples of Latin America have been collectively standing strong with dignity and sovereignty, building their futures. And then along came Obama with his "smart power," and ALBA was hit by the coup in Honduras, Latin American integration has been weakened by the US military expansion in Colombia, and the struggle for independence and sovereignty in Washington's backyard is being squashed by a sinister smile and insincere handshake.
Bowing before Washington, the crisis in Honduras "was resolved." Ironically, the same crisis was fomented by the US in the first place. There is talk of similar coups in Paraguay, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Venezuela, where subversion, counterinsurgency and destabilization increase daily. The people of Honduras remain in resistance, despite the "agreement" reached by those in power. Their determined insurrection and commitment to justice is a symbol of dignity. The only way to defeat imperialist aggression -- soft, hard, or smart -- is through the union and integration of the people.
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." -- Henry Kissinger
This article is part of an seven-part series of short quotes Rebel Youth is issuing about class struggle, revolution, civil-war, and pa...
Letter of Condolences to the Victims of Natural Disaster in Japan World Federation of Democratic Youth (WFDY) would like to express its...
Rebel Youth is looking for hitchhiking stories, and also experiences with the challenges faced by women, trans people, hitchhickers facing ...